Player Stats

Christian Fitzpatrick College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
926
Receptions
63
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonLouisville0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan State223025.4
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan State2217035.3
2023 Regular SeasonMichigan State1017240142
2024 Regular SeasonMarshall1334576676.7
2025 Regular SeasonOklahoma State4890042.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Marshall paired 576 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 57.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 4 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisville, Michigan State, Marshall, Oklahoma State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State

Games

4

Receiving Yards / G

22.5

Efficiency

57.1

Usage

14.3

Consistency

50.3

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UT Martin: 1. Oregon: 34. Tulsa: 49. Arizona: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UT Martin: 1 by 6.7. Oregon: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 81.7. Arizona: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 1 · -28.7 vs Losses
Losses29.7 · Games = 3 · +28.7 vs Wins