Player Stats

Deontae Craig College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
139
TFL
23
Sacks
15
QB hurries
16
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonIowa00-0--0-
2021 PostseasonIowa820.50--024.4
2021 Regular SeasonIowa8122.51.5--024.4
2022 PostseasonIowa13111--066.5
2022 Regular SeasonIowa13277.56.532066.5
2023 PostseasonIowa133-0--056.7
2023 Regular SeasonIowa13515371056.7
2024 PostseasonIowa13542--055.7
2024 Regular SeasonIowa13382.5161055.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Iowa paired 21 primary output with 25.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 25.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Iowa

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

25.7

Usage

9.8

Consistency

36.5

Best Game by takeover score

Missouri

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 6. Illinois State: 0. Iowa State: 0. Troy: 0. Minnesota: 2. Ohio State: 1. Washington: 1. Michigan State: 2. Northwestern: 0. Wisconsin: 1. UCLA: 1. Maryland: 0.5. Nebraska: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 5 by 70.8. Illinois State: 4 by 16.7. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. Troy: 1 by 4.2. Minnesota: 1 by 24.2. Ohio State: 3 by 22.5. Washington: 5 by 30.8. Michigan State: 4 by 36.7. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 4 by 26.7. UCLA: 2 by 18.3. Maryland: 4 by 21.7. Nebraska: 5 by 40.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 8 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 5 · +1.2 vs Wins