Usage Score
3.2
Player Dossier
2020-2024USC
Jacobe Covington
CB • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Chandler, AZ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jacobe Covington shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
17.9
Consistency
14.8
Season Value
12.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · USC
20212223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington • USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacobe Covington, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · USC. Jacobe Covington shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
USC paired 3 primary output with 13.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · USC
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
17.9
Usage
3.2
Consistency
14.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. LSU: 0. Utah State: 0.5. Michigan: 0.5. Wisconsin: 2. Minnesota: 0. Nebraska: 0. UCLA: 1. Notre Dame: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 4 by 16.7. Utah State: 3 by 17.5. Michigan: 6 by 30. Wisconsin: 1 by 24.2. Minnesota: 3 by 12.5. Nebraska: 2 by 8.3. UCLA: 5 by 30.8. Notre Dame: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 3 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
30.8 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 35-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Notre Dame | L 35-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ UCLA | W 19-13 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Nebraska | W 28-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Minnesota | L 17-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Michigan | L 24-27 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Utah State | W 48-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | @ LSU | W 27-20 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
USC
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington | 2 | 10.2 | 3.8 | 2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 4 | 9.8 | 1.2 | 2 |
| 2023 Postseason | USC | 3 | 13.4 | 2.8 | -1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 3 | 13.4 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | USC | 4 | 17.9 | 3.2 | 1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | USC | 4 | 17.9 | 3.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#2
Arizona
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.4 takeover score.
#3
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.8 takeover score.
#4
California
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#5
Arizona State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · USC
3 primary output · 13.4 efficiency · 2.8 usage
15
#2
2023 Regular Season · USC
15
3 primary · 13.4 efficiency · 2.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · USC
12.5
4 primary · 17.9 efficiency · 3.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9232
Saguaro · Scottsdale, AZ
- Committed To
- Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
60
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.