Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2020-2023UTSA
RB • 5'10" • 205 lbs • Denton, TX, USA
Kaedric Cobbs leans balanced backfield option traits and 40.8 efficiency.
Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
9
Developing production for a back
Reliability
3
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
20
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Kaedric Cobbs, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Regular Season · UTSA. Kaedric Cobbs leans balanced backfield option traits and 40.8 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 46.1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 46 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 46.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 0 | 50.9 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 41.2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 3 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 46.5 |
Related Context
Transfer Portal History
| Season | Path | Movement | Value | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | UTSA to Unlisted | G5/FCS to Unlisted | 18 | Dec 20, 2023 |
Kaedric Cobbs played RB for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kaedric Cobbs recorded 128 rushing yards, -2 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
UTSA paired 16 primary output with 54.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 40.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Win with 34 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
16.3
Efficiency
40.8
Usage
5.9
Consistency
40.7
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 4. Rice: 11. South Florida: 34
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 20.8. Rice: 2 by 57.3. South Florida: 8 by 44.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
57.3 vs Rice
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2020-2023
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 56 | 42.8 | 3.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 56 | 42.8 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 16 | 54.2 | 7.3 | -40 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 52.1 | 1.3 | -11 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 49 | 40.8 | 5.9 | 44 |
#1 Featured game
vs UTEP
Week 11 · W 52-21 · Conference game
Win with 34 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
34
Scrimmage Yards
67.5 takeover
34 scrimmage yards and 6 usage.
#2
vs Lamar
Week 2 · W 54-0
16
Scrimmage Yards
58.4 takeover
Win with 16 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
16 scrimmage yards and 7.3 usage.
#3
vs South Florida
Week 12 · W 49-21 · Conference game
34
Scrimmage Yards
58.4 takeover
Win with 34 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
34 scrimmage yards and 10.8 usage.
#4
vs North Texas
Week 14 · W 48-27 · Conference game
5
Scrimmage Yards
51.9 takeover
Win with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 1.3 usage.
#5
vs Rice
Week 11 · W 34-14 · Conference game
11
Scrimmage Yards
33.1 takeover
Win with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 3.4 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
16 primary output · 54.2 efficiency · 7.3 usage
50.9
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
46.5
49 primary · 40.8 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · UTSA
46.1
56 primary · 42.8 efficiency · 3.7 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.