Player Stats

Jasheen Davis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
150
TFL
49
Sacks
25
QB hurries
20
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonWake Forest13-0--043.3
2021 PostseasonWake Forest10211--048.6
2021 Regular SeasonWake Forest10327.54.51-048.6
2022 Regular SeasonWake Forest1133146.54-063.9
2023 Regular SeasonWake Forest1249167.5102076.3
2024 Regular SeasonWake Forest93110.55.55-063.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Wake Forest paired 35.5 primary output with 43.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 36.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

36.6

Usage

15.4

Consistency

57.3

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina A&T: 3. Louisiana: 1.5. NC State: 1.5. Clemson: 1. UConn: 0. Stanford: 3. North Carolina: 6. Miami: 2. Duke: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina A&T: 1 by 34.2. Louisiana: 4 by 31.7. NC State: 5 by 35.8. Clemson: 2 by 18.3. UConn: 2 by 8.3. Stanford: 4 by 46.7. North Carolina: 7 by 79.2. Miami: 3 by 32.5. Duke: 3 by 42.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.9 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses2.7 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs Wins