Player Stats

Kimani Vidal College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,716
Rushing yards
4,015
Receiving yards
701
Touchdowns
34

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTroy9741516225455.2
2021 Regular SeasonTroy11835701134559.7
2022 PostseasonTroy1479727167.4
2022 Regular SeasonTroy141,1981,064134967.4
2023 PostseasonTroy1482793077.9
2023 Regular SeasonTroy141,7811,5831981577.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Troy paired 1,863 primary output with 54.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 54.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stephen F. Austin

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Troy

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

133.1

Efficiency

54.3

Usage

40.8

Consistency

57.1

Best Game by takeover score

Stephen F. Austin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 82. Stephen F. Austin: 302. Kansas State: 83. James Madison: 32. Western Kentucky: 214. Georgia State: 92. Arkansas State: 245. Army: 123. Texas State: 43. South Alabama: 129. UL Monroe: 96. Louisiana: 120. Southern Miss: 69. App State: 233

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 18 by 48. Stephen F. Austin: 27 by 96.6. Kansas State: 17 by 50.9. James Madison: 12 by 26.5. Western Kentucky: 30 by 67.2. Georgia State: 25 by 36. Arkansas State: 28 by 86.5. Army: 24 by 52.9. Texas State: 18 by 24.9. South Alabama: 26 by 53.2. UL Monroe: 19 by 41.9. Louisiana: 28 by 43.8. Southern Miss: 16 by 44.9. App State: 26 by 87.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins151.5 · Games = 11 · +85.8 vs Losses
Losses65.7 · Games = 3 · -85.8 vs Wins