Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2020-2023UTSA
DL • 6'1" • 265 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Nick Booker-Brown shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.1
Efficiency
17.7
Consistency
54.7
Season Value
29.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Booker-Brown, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA. Nick Booker-Brown shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.7 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UTSA paired 12 primary output with 17.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
17.7
Usage
4.1
Consistency
54.7
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 3. Houston: 2. Texas State: 2. Temple: 0. UAB: 1. Florida Atlantic: 1. East Carolina: 0. North Texas: 2. Rice: 1. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 3 by 42.5. Houston: 2 by 28.3. Texas State: 1 by 24.2. Temple: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 1 by 14.2. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 18.3. East Carolina: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 1 by 24.2. Rice: 1 by 14.2. South Florida: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ MarshallSplash game | W 35-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulane | L 16-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs South Florida | W 49-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Rice | W 34-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ North Texas | W 37-29 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs East Carolina | W 41-27 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 36-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs UAB | W 41-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Temple | W 49-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State | W 20-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Houston | L 14-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
NC State
2020-2021
Opening stop
UTSA
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | NC State | 1 | 9.2 | 3.1 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | NC State | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 20.2 | 6.8 | 11 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 12 | 17.7 | 4.1 | 1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 17.7 | 4.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#2
Marshall
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#3
North Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
#4
Army
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.2 takeover score.
#5
Houston
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 35.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UTSA
12 primary output · 17.7 efficiency · 4.1 usage
29.9
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
29.9
12 primary · 17.7 efficiency · 4.1 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
24.5
11 primary · 20.2 efficiency · 6.8 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8889
Cardinal Newman · West Palm Beach, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
47
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Nick Booker-Brown quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit