Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024Ole Miss
DT • 6'2" • 315 lbs • Oxford, MS, USA
JJ Pegues shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.9
Efficiency
26.5
Consistency
38
Season Value
21.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JJ Pegues, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn. JJ Pegues shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.5 disruption score.
JJ Pegues played DT for Auburn and Ole Miss. Across 5 tracked seasons, JJ Pegues recorded 100 rushing yards, 58 receiving yards, and 125 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Ole Miss.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Auburn paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Auburn, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
26.5
Usage
7.9
Consistency
38
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 0. Unknown: 2. Middle Tennessee: 1. Wake Forest: 1.5. Georgia Southern: 1. Kentucky: 0.5. South Carolina: 1. LSU: 1. Oklahoma: 5. Arkansas: 0. Georgia: 1. Florida: 1. Mississippi State: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 14.2. Wake Forest: 3 by 27.5. Georgia Southern: 3 by 22.5. Kentucky: 4 by 21.7. South Carolina: 2 by 18.3. LSU: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma: 6 by 75. Arkansas: 5 by 20.8. Georgia: 1 by 14.2. Florida: 2 by 18.3. Mississippi State: 6 by 45
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
75 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/3 | vs Duke | W 52-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Mississippi State | W 26-14 | 6 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Florida | L 17-24 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Georgia | W 28-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Arkansas | W 63-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Oklahoma2+ sacks · Splash game | W 26-14 | 6 | 4 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ LSU | L 26-29 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ South Carolina | W 27-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Kentucky | L 17-20 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Georgia Southern | W 52-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Wake Forest | W 40-6 | 3 | 0 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 52-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Auburn
2020-2021
Opening stop
Ole Miss
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Auburn | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Auburn | 2 | 9.6 | 2.5 | 2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Auburn | 2 | 9.6 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 8 | 18.4 | 5.6 | 6 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ole Miss | 14.5 | 24.6 | 7.2 | 6.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 14.5 | 24.6 | 7.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ole Miss | 17 | 26.5 | 7.9 | 2.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 17 | 26.5 | 7.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#2
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.3 takeover score.
#3
Tulane
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#4
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.2 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Auburn
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
33.3
#2
2020 Regular Season · Auburn
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Ole Miss
25.3
14.5 primary · 24.6 efficiency · 7.2 usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9162
Oxford · Oxford, MS
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
125
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.