Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Florida State paired 243 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Penn State | 8 | 264 | 227 | 37 | 2 | 55.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Penn State | 3 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 36.4 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Florida State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2023 Postseason | Florida State | 8 | 31 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 61.1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida State | 8 | 212 | 156 | 56 | 4 | 61.1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida State | 7 | 84 | 84 | 0 | 3 | 32.1 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Florida State | 5 | 89 | 89 | 0 | 2 | 34.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Florida State paired 243 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Scrimmage Yards / G
17.8
Efficiency
53.7
Usage
6.1
Consistency
33.2
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 7. East Texas A&M: 2. Virginia: 32. Pittsburgh: 40. Virginia Tech: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 2 by 36.5. East Texas A&M: 3 by 6.9. Virginia: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 10 by 41.7. Virginia Tech: 1 by 83.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.