Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Auburn paired 981 primary output with 94.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Penn State | 6 | 14 | 132 | 0 | 50.2 |
| 2021 Postseason | Penn State | 13 | 3 | 74 | 1 | 57.2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Penn State | 13 | 31 | 447 | 2 | 57.2 |
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 10 | 3 | 124 | 1 | 43.8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 10 | 21 | 265 | 4 | 43.8 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Penn State | 11 | 53 | 673 | 4 | 71.9 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Auburn | 12 | 50 | 981 | 8 | 85.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Auburn paired 981 primary output with 94.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 94.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Auburn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
81.8
Efficiency
94.1
Usage
21.3
Consistency
75.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama A&M: 80. California: 30. New Mexico: 72. Arkansas: 156. Oklahoma: 77. Georgia: 95. Missouri: 16. Kentucky: 53. Vanderbilt: 78. UL Monroe: 104. Texas A&M: 104. Alabama: 116
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama A&M: 3 by 100. California: 2 by 100. New Mexico: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 5 by 100. Oklahoma: 5 by 100. Georgia: 7 by 90.5. Missouri: 2 by 53.3. Kentucky: 4 by 88.3. Vanderbilt: 4 by 100. UL Monroe: 6 by 100. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. Alabama: 8 by 96.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.