Player Stats

Cody Stufflebean College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
64
TFL
10.5
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonKansas State00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonKansas State00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonKansas State54-01-08.1
2023 Regular SeasonKansas State8192.52--022.9
2024 PostseasonKansas State11211--051.1
2024 Regular SeasonKansas State11172.515-051.1
2025 Regular SeasonKansas State10224.54.55-055.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Kansas State paired 14 primary output with 23.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 23.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Dakota

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Kansas State

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

23.2

Usage

7.3

Consistency

37.1

Best Game by takeover score

North Dakota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Dakota: 5. Iowa State: 0. Army: 1. Arizona: 0. UCF: 2. Baylor: 2. Kansas: 1. Oklahoma State: 2. Utah: 1. Colorado: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Dakota: 2 by 58.3. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. Army: 4 by 26.7. Arizona: 2 by 8.3. UCF: 0 by 20. Baylor: 4 by 36.7. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 24.2. Utah: 3 by 22.5. Colorado: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 5 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 5 · -1.2 vs Wins