Player Stats

Rylie Mills College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
122
TFL
23.5
Sacks
16
QB hurries
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 PostseasonNotre Dame51-0--028
2020 Regular SeasonNotre Dame5620.5--028
2021 Regular SeasonNotre Dame916333-038.4
2022 Regular SeasonNotre Dame8204.52.5--027.6
2023 PostseasonNotre Dame122-01-051.6
2023 Regular SeasonNotre Dame12405.52.53-051.6
2024 PostseasonNotre Dame13211--056.3
2024 Regular SeasonNotre Dame13357.56.54-056.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 20 primary output with 25.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 25.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

25.7

Usage

8.1

Consistency

31.9

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 2. Texas A&M: 0. Northern Illinois: 1. Purdue: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Louisville: 1. Stanford: 2. Georgia Tech: 4. Navy: 0. Florida State: 7. Virginia: 0. Army: 1. USC: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 28.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 4 by 26.7. Purdue: 1 by 14.2. Miami (OH): 3 by 12.5. Louisville: 4 by 26.7. Stanford: 4 by 36.7. Georgia Tech: 3 by 52.5. Navy: 1 by 4.2. Florida State: 5 by 70.8. Virginia: 4 by 16.7. Army: 2 by 18.3. USC: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 12 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 1 · -0.6 vs Wins