Player Stats

Alfred Collins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
141
TFL
18
Sacks
7.5
QB hurries
11
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 PostseasonTexas1050.50-1039.9
2020 Regular SeasonTexas101821.5-2039.9
2021 Regular SeasonTexas925524-053.3
2022 Regular SeasonTexas916312-028.2
2023 PostseasonTexas114-0--044.2
2023 Regular SeasonTexas11182241044.2
2024 PostseasonTexas16120.50--052.9
2024 Regular SeasonTexas16435116052.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Texas paired 11 primary output with 23.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 22.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Texas

Games

16

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

22.8

Usage

4.1

Consistency

55.2

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213141516

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 0. Arizona State: 0. Clemson: 0.5. Colorado State: 0. Michigan: 1. UTSA: 1. UL Monroe: 1. Mississippi State: 0. Oklahoma: 0.5. Georgia: 1. Vanderbilt: 1. Florida: 1. Arkansas: 3. Kentucky: 0.5. Texas A&M: 1. Georgia: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 2 by 8.3. Arizona State: 6 by 25. Clemson: 4 by 21.7. Colorado State: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 1 by 14.2. UTSA: 2 by 18.3. UL Monroe: 3 by 22.5. Mississippi State: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma: 3 by 17.5. Georgia: 6 by 35. Vanderbilt: 6 by 35. Florida: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 7 by 59.2. Kentucky: 4 by 21.7. Texas A&M: 1 by 14.2. Georgia: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 13 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Wins