Player Stats

Jalen McMillan College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,143
Receptions
164
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonWashington3116033.7
2021 Regular SeasonWashington1039470352.8
2022 PostseasonWashington13858181.7
2022 Regular SeasonWashington13711,040881.7
2023 PostseasonWashington71191268.5
2023 Regular SeasonWashington734468468.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Washington paired 1,098 primary output with 81.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Washington

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

79.9

Efficiency

75

Usage

23.5

Consistency

69.7

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 33. Texas: 58. Boise State: 95. Tulsa: 120. Michigan State: 96. Washington State: 26. Oregon: 131

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 6 by 36.7. Texas: 5 by 77.3. Boise State: 8 by 79.2. Tulsa: 8 by 100. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Washington State: 5 by 34.7. Oregon: 9 by 97

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins87.7 · Games = 6 · +54.7 vs Losses
Losses33 · Games = 1 · -54.7 vs Wins