Player Stats

Michael Alaimo College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
984
Passing yards
1,007
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonPurdue00000-
2021 Regular SeasonPurdue1-30-3024
2022 PostseasonPurdue3533815138.1
2022 Regular SeasonPurdue3503713038.1
2023 Regular SeasonKent State8884932-48368.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Kent State paired 884 primary output with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Kent State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Loss with 139 yards of offense and 51.8 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Kent State

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

110.5

Efficiency

54.7

Usage

19.3

Consistency

75.4

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 167. Arkansas: 128. Central Connecticut: 190. Fresno State: 105. Miami (OH): 139. Ohio: 89. Eastern Michigan: 22. Buffalo: 44

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 38 by 49.1. Arkansas: 28 by 56.6. Central Connecticut: 21 by 68.9. Fresno State: 18 by 55. Miami (OH): 42 by 51.8. Ohio: 20 by 51.8. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 59.1. Buffalo: 25 by 45.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins190 · Games = 1 · +90.9 vs Losses
Losses99.1 · Games = 7 · -90.9 vs Wins