Usage Score
21.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024Florida
Xzavier Henderson
WR • 6'3" • 200 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Xzavier Henderson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.7
Consistency
66.2
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Cincinnati
20202121222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Florida • Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Xzavier Henderson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Xzavier Henderson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 782 primary output with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Cincinnati.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
61.3
Efficiency
83.7
Usage
21.9
Consistency
66.2
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 101. Pittsburgh: 80. Miami (OH): 108. Houston: 34. Texas Tech: 127. UCF: 21. Arizona State: 67. Colorado: 11. West Virginia: 68. Iowa State: 12. Kansas State: 60. TCU: 46
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 96.2. Pittsburgh: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 10 by 72. Houston: 2 by 100. Texas Tech: 7 by 100. UCF: 2 by 70. Arizona State: 8 by 55.8. Colorado: 1 by 73.3. West Virginia: 8 by 56.7. Iowa State: 1 by 80. Kansas State: 4 by 100. TCU: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins57.5 · n=4 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses57.7 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half78.5 · n=6 · +34.5 vs Second Half
Second Half44 · n=6 · -34.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs TCU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs TCU | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Kansas State | L 15-41 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Iowa State | L 17-34 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs West VirginiaHigh volume | L 24-31 | — | 8 | 68 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Colorado | L 23-34 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Arizona StateHigh volume | W 24-14 | — | 8 | 67 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ UCF | W 19-13 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards | L 41-44 | — | 7 | 127 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Houston2+ TD | W 34-0 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-16 | — | 10 | 108 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Pittsburgh | L 27-28 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 7 | 101 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida
2020-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Cincinnati
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202020212021202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Florida | 148 | 88.3 | 5.4 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Florida | 148 | 88.3 | 5.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Florida | 277 | 70 | 12.2 | 129 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Florida | 277 | 70 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Florida | 410 | 61 | 25.6 | 133 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 782 | 79 | 29.1 | 372 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 735 | 83.7 | 21.9 | -47 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
140
Primary metric
140 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
149
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Cincinnati
782 primary output · 79 efficiency · 29.1 usage
67.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · Cincinnati
66.3
735 primary · 83.7 efficiency · 21.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Florida
51
410 primary · 61 efficiency · 25.6 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.97
Columbus · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,352
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.