Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024Texas Tech
Myles Price
WR • 5'9" • 185 lbs • The Colony, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Myles Price reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.6
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Texas Tech
2021212222232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas Tech • Indiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Myles Price, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Texas Tech. Myles Price reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 513 primary output with 73.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, Indiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Indiana
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
35.8
Efficiency
73.6
Usage
15.9
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 56. Florida International: 29. Unknown: 38. UCLA: 39. Charlotte: 77. Maryland: 63. Northwestern: 20. Nebraska: 23. Washington: 30. Michigan State: 42. Michigan: 16. Ohio State: 13. Purdue: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 5 by 74.7. Florida International: 4 by 48.3. Unknown: 4 by 63.3. UCLA: 3 by 86.7. Charlotte: 3 by 100. Maryland: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 33.3. Nebraska: 3 by 51.1. Washington: 2 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 93.3. Michigan: 2 by 53.3. Ohio State: 1 by 86.7. Purdue: 2 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins35.9 · n=10 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses34.5 · n=2 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half46 · n=7 · +22 vs Second Half
Second Half24 · n=6 · -22 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-27 | — | 5 | 56 | 9.7 | 11.20 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Purdue | W 66-0 | — | 2 | 20 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Ohio State | L 15-38 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Michigan | W 20-15 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Michigan State | W 47-10 | — | 3 | 42 | 16.8 | 14 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Washington | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Nebraska | W 56-7 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Northwestern | W 41-24 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Maryland | W 42-28 | — | 2 | 63 | 21.3 | 31.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Charlotte | W 52-14 | — | 3 | 77 | 20.3 | 25.70 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ UCLA | W 42-13 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 23 |
| Fri 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 38 | 7 | 9.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Florida International | W 31-7 | — | 4 | 29 | 8.2 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Indiana
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20202021202120222022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 300 | 64.5 | 12.8 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Texas Tech | 523 | 67.6 | 18.4 | 223 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 523 | 67.6 | 18.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Texas Tech | 513 | 73.1 | 17.3 | -10 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 513 | 73.1 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 410 | 65.7 | 22.6 | -103 |
| 2024 Postseason | Indiana | 466 | 73.6 | 15.9 | 56 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Indiana | 466 | 73.6 | 15.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
175
Primary metric
175 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Charlotte
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
West Virginia
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 75.2 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Texas Tech
513 primary output · 73.1 efficiency · 17.3 usage
65.1
#2
2022 Regular Season · Texas Tech
65.1
513 primary · 73.1 efficiency · 17.3 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Indiana
60.7
466 primary · 73.6 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9763
Richardson · Richardson, TX
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,212
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.