Player Stats

Ja'Lynn Polk College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,231
Receptions
143
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1028264238
2021 Regular SeasonWashington35114150.3
2022 PostseasonWashington13345059.9
2022 Regular SeasonWashington1338649659.9
2023 PostseasonWashington139159182.3
2023 Regular SeasonWashington13601,000982.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Washington paired 1,159 primary output with 86.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, Washington.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Washington

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

89.2

Efficiency

86.8

Usage

20.5

Consistency

73.8

Best Game by takeover score

California

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 37. Texas: 122. Boise State: 101. Tulsa: 81. Michigan State: 118. California: 127. Arizona: 41. Oregon: 118. Arizona State: 102. Stanford: 148. USC: 52. Utah: 55. Oregon: 57

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 4 by 61.7. Texas: 5 by 100. Boise State: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 5 by 100. Michigan State: 5 by 100. California: 8 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 54.7. Oregon: 6 by 100. Arizona State: 9 by 75.6. Stanford: 5 by 100. USC: 5 by 69.3. Utah: 4 by 91.7. Oregon: 5 by 76

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins93.5 · Games = 12 · +56.5 vs Losses
Losses37 · Games = 1 · -56.5 vs Wins