Player Stats

Michael Shawcroft College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
172
TFL
23.5
Sacks
10
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonSan Diego State45-0--038.6
2020 Regular SeasonSan Diego State83440.51-039.9
2021 PostseasonSan Diego State132-0--050.9
2021 Regular SeasonSan Diego State13536.5331050.9
2022 PostseasonSan Diego State11111--077.8
2022 Regular SeasonSan Diego State1177125.5-3077.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

San Diego State paired 22.5 primary output with 50 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 50 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Postseason · San Diego State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.0

Efficiency

50

Usage

14.1

Consistency

61.2

Best Game by takeover score

Fresno State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 2. Arizona: 0. Idaho State: 4. Utah: 3. Toledo: 1.5. Boise State: 0.5. Nevada: 3. Fresno State: 4. UNLV: 1.5. New Mexico: 0. Air Force: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 24.2. Arizona: 9 by 37.5. Idaho State: 6 by 65. Utah: 5 by 50.8. Toledo: 9 by 52.5. Boise State: 6 by 30. Nevada: 7 by 59.2. Fresno State: 10 by 81.7. UNLV: 11 by 60.8. New Mexico: 2 by 8.3. Air Force: 12 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · Games = 6 · +0.1 vs Wins