Player Stats

Jordan Revels College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
225
TFL
31
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
25
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonTexas State9251.503-024.5
2020 Regular SeasonTexas State733302-038.8
2021 Regular SeasonTexas State12597.5372063.2
2022 Regular SeasonTexas State1269114.5101072.8
2023 PostseasonTexas State8511--047
2023 Regular SeasonTexas State834703-047

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Texas State paired 26.5 primary output with 44.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 35.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Texas State

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

35.3

Usage

8.7

Consistency

34.7

Best Game by takeover score

South Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rice: 2. Baylor: 0. UTSA: 1. UL Monroe: 2.5. Troy: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0.5. Arkansas State: 1. South Alabama: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 5 by 40.8. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 8 by 43.3. UL Monroe: 8 by 58.3. Troy: 1 by 4.2. Coastal Carolina: 6 by 30. Arkansas State: 3 by 22.5. South Alabama: 6 by 75

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.4 · Games = 4 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 4 · -1.8 vs Wins