Player Stats

Darien Porter College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
51
TFL
2
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonIowa State00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonIowa State55-0--036.7
2021 Regular SeasonIowa State43-0--036
2022 Regular SeasonIowa State915-0-109.3
2023 PostseasonIowa State82-0--018.1
2023 Regular SeasonIowa State88-0-3018.1
2024 Regular SeasonIowa State101820-2039.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Iowa State paired 7 primary output with 14.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 14.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Iowa State

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

14.5

Usage

3.8

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 2. Arkansas State: 0. Houston: 1. West Virginia: 0. UCF: 2. Texas Tech: 2. Kansas: 0. Utah: 0. Kansas State: 0. Arizona State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 28.3. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 1 by 14.2. West Virginia: 1 by 4.2. UCF: 2 by 28.3. Texas Tech: 1 by 24.2. Kansas: 6 by 25. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 7 · +0.0 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · -0.0 vs Wins