Player Stats

Bud Clark College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
194
TFL
3.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
19
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTCU33-0--037
2021 Regular SeasonTCU310-0--047.6
2022 PostseasonTCU100-0-1252
2022 Regular SeasonTCU102710-4052
2023 Regular SeasonTCU103010-4043.3
2024 PostseasonTCU123-0-1041.4
2024 Regular SeasonTCU1265-0-2041.4
2025 PostseasonTCU112-0-2058.5
2025 Regular SeasonTCU11541.5115258.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

TCU paired 14.5 primary output with 34 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 34 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · TCU

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

34

Usage

6.7

Consistency

44.1

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. USC: 2. North Carolina: 1. Abilene Christian: 0. SMU: 2. Arizona State: 1. Colorado: 4. Kansas State: 0. Baylor: 2. West Virginia: 0.5. Iowa State: 2. BYU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 2 by 28.3. North Carolina: 5 by 30.8. Abilene Christian: 4 by 16.7. SMU: 4 by 36.7. Arizona State: 9 by 47.5. Colorado: 5 by 60.8. Kansas State: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 2 by 28.3. West Virginia: 13 by 55. Iowa State: 6 by 45. BYU: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 7 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 4 · -0.9 vs Wins