Usage Score
25.2
Player Dossier
2019-2024Toledo
WR • 5'11" • 192 lbs • Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
Jerjuan Newton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.2
Efficiency
82.1
Consistency
59.7
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerjuan Newton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo. Jerjuan Newton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Toledo paired 1,033 primary output with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
79.5
Efficiency
82.1
Usage
25.2
Consistency
59.7
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 84. Unknown: 98. Massachusetts: 40. Mississippi State: 62. Western Kentucky: 31. Miami (OH): 127. Buffalo: 159. Northern Illinois: 64. Bowling Green: 164. Eastern Michigan: 38. Central Michigan: 40. Ohio: 45. Akron: 81
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 8 by 70. Unknown: 5 by 100. Massachusetts: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 82.7. Western Kentucky: 5 by 41.3. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. Buffalo: 7 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 100. Bowling Green: 9 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 42.2. Central Michigan: 3 by 88.9. Ohio: 4 by 75. Akron: 8 by 67.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | vs PittsburghHigh volume | W 48-46 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Wed 11/27 | @ AkronHigh volume | L 14-21 | — | 8 | 81 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 19 |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Ohio | L 7-24 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Central Michigan | W 37-10 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 29-28 | — | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Bowling Green100 receiving yards · High volume | L 26-41 | — | 9 | 164 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 2 | 64 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 13-6 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 15-30 | — | 7 | 159 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-20 | — | 8 | 127 | 14.2 | 15.90 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Western Kentucky | L 21-26 | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Mississippi State2+ TD | W 41-17 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Massachusetts | W 38-23 | — | 1 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 1 | 40 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 1 | 54 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2019-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 21 | 100 | 6.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 203 | 79.5 | 11.5 | 182 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 144 | 69 | 10 | -59 |
| 2022 Postseason | Toledo | 830 | 87 | 23.8 | 686 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 830 | 87 | 23.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Toledo | 696 | 84.4 | 22.4 | -134 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 696 | 84.4 | 22.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Toledo | 1,033 | 82.1 | 25.2 | 337 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,033 | 82.1 | 25.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
164
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
159
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Toledo
1,033 primary output · 82.1 efficiency · 25.2 usage
66.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · Toledo
66.7
1,033 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 25.2 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Toledo
65.7
830 primary · 87 efficiency · 23.8 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8714
Perry Hall · Nottingham, MD
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,927
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jerjuan Newton quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit