Player Stats

Tiawan Mullen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
142
TFL
9
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonIndiana104-0-1047
2019 Regular SeasonIndiana10243.50-12047
2020 PostseasonIndiana82-0--065.2
2020 Regular SeasonIndiana8354.53.513065.2
2021 Regular SeasonIndiana519-0-3018.7
2022 Regular SeasonIndiana125810-8049.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Indiana paired 15 primary output with 38 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 29.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Indiana

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

29.3

Usage

5.5

Consistency

57.5

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 1. Idaho: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Cincinnati: 1. Nebraska: 1. Michigan: 1. Maryland: 1. Rutgers: 0. Penn State: 1. Ohio State: 3. Michigan State: 0. Purdue: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 4 by 26.7. Idaho: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 7 by 29.2. Cincinnati: 6 by 35. Nebraska: 5 by 30.8. Michigan: 4 by 26.7. Maryland: 4 by 26.7. Rutgers: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 8 by 43.3. Ohio State: 4 by 46.7. Michigan State: 8 by 33.3. Purdue: 4 by 36.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 4 · -1 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 8 · +1 vs Wins