Usage Score
25.3
Player Dossier
2019-2023South Carolina
Xavier Legette
WR • 6'3" • 227 lbs • Mullins, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Xavier Legette reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.9
Consistency
65.7
Season Value
69.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · South Carolina
19202121222223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- South Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Jacksonville State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Xavier Legette, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · South Carolina. Xavier Legette reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
South Carolina paired 1,255 primary output with 86.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Jacksonville State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · South Carolina
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
104.6
Efficiency
86.9
Usage
25.3
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 178. Unknown: 118. Georgia: 71. Mississippi State: 189. Tennessee: 50. Florida: 110. Missouri: 20. Texas A&M: 20. Jacksonville State: 217. Vanderbilt: 120. Kentucky: 94. Clemson: 68
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 9 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. Georgia: 7 by 67.6. Mississippi State: 5 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 66.7. Florida: 5 by 100. Missouri: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 44.4. Jacksonville State: 9 by 100. Vanderbilt: 9 by 88.9. Kentucky: 6 by 100. Clemson: 6 by 75.6
Split Comparison
Wins155 · n=4 · +81.1 vs Losses
Losses73.9 · n=7 · -81.1 vs Wins
First Half119.3 · n=6 · +29.5 vs Second Half
Second Half89.8 · n=6 · -29.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Jacksonville State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | vs Clemson | L 7-16 | — | 6 | 68 | 9.6 | 11.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Kentucky2+ TD | W 17-14 | — | 6 | 94 | 8.3 | 15.70 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | W 47-6 | — | 9 | 120 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Jacksonville State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-28 | — | 9 | 217 | 24.1 | 24.10 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-30 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Missouri | L 12-34 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Florida100 receiving yards | L 39-41 | — | 5 | 110 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Tennessee | L 20-41 | — | 5 | 50 | 9.5 | 10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 37-30 | — | 5 | 189 | 37.8 | 37.80 | 2 | 76 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Georgia | L 14-24 | — | 7 | 71 | 8.8 | 10.10 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 118 | 16.7 | 19.70 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ North Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-31 | — | 9 | 178 | 17.6 | 19.80 | 0 | 37 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | South Carolina | 80 | 52.8 | 11.6 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | South Carolina | 113 | 100 | 11.7 | 33 |
| 2021 Postseason | South Carolina | 63 | 46.3 | 9.9 | -50 |
| 2021 Regular Season | South Carolina | 63 | 46.3 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | South Carolina | 167 | 52.6 | 9.5 | 104 |
| 2022 Regular Season | South Carolina | 167 | 52.6 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | South Carolina | 1,255 | 86.9 | 25.3 | 1,088 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Jacksonville State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
217
Primary metric
217 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
189
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
189 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Carolina
178
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 74.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · South Carolina
1,255 primary output · 86.9 efficiency · 25.3 usage
69.5
#2
2020 Regular Season · South Carolina
43.9
113 primary · 100 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · South Carolina
24.8
167 primary · 52.6 efficiency · 9.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8753
Centennial · Corona, CA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,678
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.