Usage Score
20.5
Player Dossier
2019-2024Utah State
Cooper Legas
QB • 6'1" • 216 lbs • Orem, UT, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Cooper Legas is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
55.9
Consistency
34.4
Season Value
44.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Utah State
1920212122222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Utah State • Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cooper Legas, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Utah State. Cooper Legas is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Utah State paired 1,937 primary output with 61.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 379 yards of offense and 69.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
134.5
Efficiency
55.9
Usage
20.5
Consistency
34.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 7. Oklahoma State: 33. North Texas: 53. Army: 101. Temple: 37. UTSA: 379. UAB: 226. East Carolina: 336. South Florida: 127. Florida Atlantic: 46
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 35. Oklahoma State: 7 by 64.4. North Texas: 5 by 76.7. Army: 24 by 57.1. Temple: 8 by 65.1. UTSA: 44 by 69.1. UAB: 52 by 48.8. East Carolina: 45 by 64.8. South Florida: 30 by 39.4. Florida Atlantic: 24 by 38.5
Split Comparison
Losses119.9 · n=8
First Half46.2 · n=5 · -176.6 vs Second Half
Second Half222.8 · n=5 · +176.6 vs First Half
All Games134.5 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
76.7 vs North Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 16-63 | 9 | 19 | 63 | 47.4 | 0 | 1 | 38.5 | 5 | -17 | -3.40 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ South Florida | L 30-63 | 10 | 25 | 113 | 40.0 | 1 | 3 | 39.4 | 5 | 14 | 2.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 11/15 | vs East Carolina3+ TD | L 31-38 | 20 | 32 | 293 | 62.5 | 3 | 1 | 64.8 | 13 | 43 | 3.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UAB | L 21-59 | 21 | 38 | 230 | 55.3 | 2 | 1 | 48.8 | 14 | -4 | -0.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs UTSA300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 46-45 | 16 | 31 | 333 | 51.6 | 5 | 0 | 69.1 | 13 | 46 | 3.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Temple | L 10-20 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 65.1 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs ArmyDual-threat | L 7-49 | 4 | 7 | 20 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 57.1 | 17 | 81 | 4.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ North Texas | L 20-52 | 2 | 3 | 45 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 76.7 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Oklahoma State | L 10-45 | 2 | 3 | 30 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 64.4 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah State
2019-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Tulsa
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202120212022202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Utah State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Utah State | 157 | 25.8 | 9.4 | 157 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Utah State | 157 | 25.8 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Utah State | 1,802 | 55.1 | 24.9 | 1,645 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Utah State | 1,802 | 55.1 | 24.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Utah State | 1,937 | 61.4 | 19.4 | 135 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,345 | 55.9 | 20.5 | -592 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 379 yards of offense and 69.1 efficiency.
379
Primary metric
379 total offense with 69.1 efficiency.
#2
Boise State
357
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
357 total offense with 58.8 efficiency.
#3
Fresno State
406
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
406 total offense with 62.2 efficiency.
#4
Air Force
291
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
291 total offense with 74.3 efficiency.
#5
East Carolina
336
Primary metric
Loss with 336 yards of offense and 64.8 efficiency.
336 total offense with 64.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Utah State
1,937 primary output · 61.4 efficiency · 19.4 usage
62
#2
2022 Postseason · Utah State
59.5
1,802 primary · 55.1 efficiency · 24.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Utah State
59.5
1,802 primary · 55.1 efficiency · 24.9 usage
Milestones
7
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
13
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8133
Orem · Orem, UT
- Committed To
- Utah State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
5,241
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.