Player Dossier

2020-2025

Texas A&M

Dayon Hayes

DE • 6'3" • 264 lbs • Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Dayon Hayes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.2 disruption score.

Usage Score

4.4

Efficiency

14.2

Consistency

36.7

Season Value

18.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

2021212222232425

Snapshot

Career Teams
3
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Pittsburgh • Colorado • Texas A&M
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Dayon Hayes, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Dayon Hayes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.2 disruption score.

Dayon Hayes played DE for Pittsburgh, Colorado, and Texas A&M. Across 6 tracked seasons, Dayon Hayes recorded 110 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Pittsburgh.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 5 primary output with 31.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 14.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Colorado, Texas A&M.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Auburn

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

14.2

Usage

4.4

Consistency

36.7

Best Game by takeover score

Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 0. Utah State: 0.5. Notre Dame: 0. Auburn: 2. Florida: 2. Arkansas: 1. LSU: 1. Missouri: 0. South Carolina: 2. Unknown: 0. Texas: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Utah State: 3 by 17.5. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 3 by 32.5. Florida: 2 by 28.3. Arkansas: 2 by 18.3. LSU: 1 by 14.2. Missouri: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 1 by 24.2. Unknown: 0 by 0. Texas: 0 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 9
First Half0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games0.8 · Games = 11

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Auburn

Best efficiency game

32.5 vs Auburn

Result
Sat 11/29@ TexasL 17-2700000
Sat 11/22vs Unknown00000
Sat 11/15vs South CarolinaW 31-3011110
Sat 11/8@ MissouriW 38-1722000
Sat 10/25@ LSUW 49-2511001
Sat 10/18@ ArkansasW 45-42200.500.500
Sat 10/11vs FloridaW 34-1721110
Sat 9/27vs AuburnW 16-1033110
Sat 9/13@ Notre DameW 41-4011000
Sat 9/6vs Utah StateW 44-22320.5000
Sat 8/30vs UTSAW 42-2421000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Pittsburgh

    2020-2023

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Colorado

    2024

    Peak year stop

  3. 3

    Texas A&M

    2025

    Final stop

Season Progression

20202021202120222022202320242025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2020 Regular SeasonPittsburgh531.311.7
2021 PostseasonPittsburgh1317.95.98
2021 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1317.95.90
2022 PostseasonPittsburgh822.89.8-5
2022 Regular SeasonPittsburgh822.89.80
2023 Regular SeasonPittsburgh18.529.49.810.5
2024 Regular SeasonColorado5.530.411.5-13
2025 Regular SeasonTexas A&M8.514.24.43

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Boston College

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

7

Primary metric

7 disruption/tackle impact with 65.6 takeover score.

#2

Miami

7

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

7 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.

#3

Colorado State

4.5

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.3 takeover score.

#4

Syracuse

4.5

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.

#5

Unknown

4

Primary metric

Game with backfield disruption leading the way.

4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

5 primary output · 31.3 efficiency · 11.7 usage

29.3

#2

2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

28.7

18.5 primary · 29.4 efficiency · 9.8 usage

#3

2021 Postseason · Pittsburgh

24.6

13 primary · 17.9 efficiency · 5.9 usage

Milestones

3

Impact games

7

Splash games

0

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2020 · Rating 0.9001

Westinghouse · Pittsburgh, PA

Committed To
Pittsburgh
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2020

Career Facts

3

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

110

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.