Player Stats

Cedric Gray College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
359
TFL
27
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
13
Passes defended
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina33-0--037
2021 PostseasonNorth Carolina121321--055.7
2021 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina128641.523055.7
2022 PostseasonNorth Carolina140-0-1071.3
2022 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina1413610145071.3
2023 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina1212111574081.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

North Carolina paired 28 primary output with 61.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 61.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Campbell

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · North Carolina

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

61.5

Usage

14.7

Consistency

65.4

Best Game by takeover score

Campbell

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 3. App State: 2. Minnesota: 2. Pittsburgh: 5. Syracuse: 3. Miami: 3. Virginia: 2.5. Georgia Tech: 0. Campbell: 5. Duke: 0. Clemson: 1. NC State: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 9 by 67.5. App State: 11 by 65.8. Minnesota: 7 by 49.2. Pittsburgh: 7 by 79.2. Syracuse: 8 by 63.3. Miami: 10 by 71.7. Virginia: 18 by 75. Georgia Tech: 6 by 25. Campbell: 9 by 87.5. Duke: 11 by 45.8. Clemson: 8 by 43.3. NC State: 17 by 65

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.9 · Games = 8 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 4 · -1.6 vs Wins