Player Stats

Jimmy Calloway College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
418
Receptions
32
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTennessee2220040.1
2021 Regular SeasonTennessee3584144.8
2022 Regular SeasonTennessee1220052.1
2023 PostseasonLouisville1118058.9
2023 Regular SeasonLouisville1119234258.9
2024 Regular SeasonLouisville0-00-
2025 Regular SeasonTulane5352229.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Louisville paired 242 primary output with 66.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Louisville, Tulane.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Tulane

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

10.4

Efficiency

57.8

Usage

4.7

Consistency

22.7

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 0. East Carolina: 5. UTSA: 41. Florida Atlantic: 6. Temple: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 1 by 33.3. UTSA: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.8 · Games = 4 · -38.3 vs Losses
Losses41 · Games = 1 · +38.3 vs Wins