Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2020-2022Mississippi State
Emmanuel Forbes
CB • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Grenada, MS, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Emmanuel Forbes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.2
Consistency
54.6
Season Value
30.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Mississippi State
2020212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Emmanuel Forbes, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Mississippi State. Emmanuel Forbes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 14 primary output with 30.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
30.2
Usage
6.9
Consistency
54.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 0. Arizona: 3. LSU: 0. Bowling Green: 1. Texas A&M: 3. Arkansas: 3. Kentucky: 2. Alabama: 0. Georgia: 0. Unknown: 3.5. Ole Miss: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 2 by 38.3. LSU: 3 by 12.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 22.5. Texas A&M: 1 by 34.2. Arkansas: 6 by 55. Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Georgia: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 2 by 43.3. Ole Miss: 9 by 52.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.9 · Games = 6 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half1.7 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
55 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-22 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Georgia | L 19-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama | L 6-30 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Kentucky | L 17-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Arkansas | W 40-17 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Texas A&MSplash game | W 42-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Bowling Green | W 45-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ LSU | L 16-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | @ Arizona | W 39-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Memphis | W 49-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Mississippi State | 10.5 | 29.3 | 10 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 10.5 | 29.3 | 10 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Mississippi State | 14 | 30.5 | 8.8 | 3.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 14 | 30.5 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 17 | 30.2 | 6.9 | 3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
NC State
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#2
Missouri
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3.5
Primary metric
Game with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.3 takeover score.
#4
Arkansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.9 takeover score.
#5
Arizona
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Mississippi State
14 primary output · 30.5 efficiency · 8.8 usage
32
#2
2021 Regular Season · Mississippi State
32
14 primary · 30.5 efficiency · 8.8 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Mississippi State
30.9
17 primary · 30.2 efficiency · 6.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9245
Grenada · Grenada, MS
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
143
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.