Player Stats

Van Fillinger College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
134
TFL
28
Sacks
19
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonUtah11-0--037.5
2021 PostseasonUtah141-0--053.6
2021 Regular SeasonUtah14409.55.54-053.6
2022 Regular SeasonUtah718551-054.4
2023 PostseasonUtah9410.5--043
2023 Regular SeasonUtah9274.53--043
2024 Regular SeasonUtah10438515066.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Utah paired 19 primary output with 36.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 36.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Utah

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

36.9

Usage

10.3

Consistency

44.7

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Utah: 5. Baylor: 3. Utah State: 4.5. Oklahoma State: 2. Arizona: 0. Arizona State: 0.5. TCU: 0. Houston: 0. BYU: 3. UCF: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Utah: 3 by 62.5. Baylor: 5 by 50.8. Utah State: 8 by 78.3. Oklahoma State: 3 by 32.5. Arizona: 4 by 16.7. Arizona State: 5 by 25.8. TCU: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 3 by 12.5. BYU: 4 by 46.7. UCF: 7 by 39.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.1 · Games = 5 · +2.4 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · -2.4 vs Wins