Player Stats

Daquan Evans College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
174
TFL
17.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
11
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonSouth Florida48-0--011.2
2020 Regular SeasonSouth Florida92810-1227.4
2021 Regular SeasonSouth Florida10592.50-3039.7
2022 Regular SeasonSouth Florida515-0--043.8
2023 PostseasonSouth Florida13521--071.1
2023 Regular SeasonSouth Florida135912357071.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

South Florida paired 31 primary output with 41.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 41.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · South Florida

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.4

Efficiency

41.3

Usage

10.9

Consistency

52.4

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 3. Western Kentucky: 2. Florida A&M: 3. Alabama: 9. Rice: 1. Navy: 1. UAB: 0. Florida Atlantic: 2. UConn: 1. Memphis: 2. Temple: 3. UTSA: 1.5. Charlotte: 2.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 5 by 50.8. Western Kentucky: 5 by 40.8. Florida A&M: 5 by 50.8. Alabama: 8 by 83.3. Rice: 3 by 22.5. Navy: 7 by 39.2. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 45. UConn: 4 by 26.7. Memphis: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 3 by 42.5. UTSA: 8 by 48.3. Charlotte: 5 by 45.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.1 · Games = 7 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses2.8 · Games = 6 · +0.7 vs Wins