Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2019-2023California
RB • 5'10" • 205 lbs • Amarillo, TX, USA
King Doerue leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage Score
22.8
Efficiency
34.7
Consistency
51.7
Season Value
50.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
King Doerue, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Purdue. King Doerue leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Purdue paired 689 primary output with 43 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 34.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
49.9
Efficiency
34.7
Usage
22.8
Consistency
51.7
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 1. Vanderbilt: 9. TCU: 36. Minnesota: 126. Penn State: 26. Maryland: 97. Iowa: 42. Illinois: 37. Nebraska: 102. Northwestern: 53. Wisconsin: 26. Indiana: 44
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 1 by 10.4. Vanderbilt: 5 by 18.8. TCU: 12 by 27.8. Minnesota: 24 by 51.3. Penn State: 11 by 24.6. Maryland: 22 by 41.1. Iowa: 13 by 29.7. Illinois: 15 by 25.7. Nebraska: 20 by 50.8. Northwestern: 12 by 48.3. Wisconsin: 9 by 30.1. Indiana: 6 by 58.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
58.1 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Indiana | L 41-44 | 5 | 22 | 4.40 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 7.3 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Wisconsin | L 24-45 | 9 | 26 | 2.90 | 0 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Northwestern | W 24-22 | 9 | 43 | 4.80 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 4.4 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Nebraska2+ TD | W 31-27 | 15 | 71 | 4.70 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Illinois | L 6-24 | 15 | 37 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Iowa | L 20-26 | 10 | 26 | 2.60 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Maryland | W 40-14 | 19 | 69 | 3.60 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 4.4 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Penn State | L 7-35 | 11 | 26 | 2.40 | 0 | — | — | 2.4 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Minnesota2+ TD | L 31-38 | 20 | 94 | 4.70 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs TCU | L 13-34 | 11 | 27 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Vanderbilt | W 42-24 | 5 | 9 | 1.80 | 0 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Nevada | L 31-34 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2019-2022
Opening stop
California
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 599 | 34.7 | 22.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 87 | 38.6 | 7.8 | -512 |
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 689 | 43 | 20.2 | 602 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 689 | 43 | 20.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 154 | 35.8 | 13.4 | -535 |
| 2023 Regular Season | California | 0 | — | — | -154 |
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Loss with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
47
Primary metric
47 scrimmage yards and 11.3 usage.
#2
Minnesota
126
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
126 scrimmage yards and 40 usage.
#3
Minnesota
134
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
134 scrimmage yards and 39.7 usage.
#4
Penn State
67
Primary metric
Loss with 67 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
67 scrimmage yards and 32.7 usage.
#5
Nebraska
69
Primary metric
Win with 69 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
69 scrimmage yards and 12.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Purdue
689 primary output · 43 efficiency · 20.2 usage
56.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Purdue
56.8
689 primary · 43 efficiency · 20.2 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
50.4
599 primary · 34.7 efficiency · 22.8 usage
3
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8811
Dutchtown · Geismar, LA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,529
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
King Doerue quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit