Usage Score
42.4
Player Dossier
2019-2023Kentucky
RB • 5'10" • 216 lbs • San Francisco, CA, USA
Ray Davis leans workhorse runner traits and 57.6 efficiency.
Usage Score
42.4
Efficiency
57.6
Consistency
57
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ray Davis, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · Kentucky. Ray Davis leans workhorse runner traits and 57.6 efficiency.
Ray Davis played RB for Temple, Vanderbilt, and Kentucky. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ray Davis recorded 3,510 rushing yards, 724 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Kentucky.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Kentucky paired 1,452 primary output with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Temple, Vanderbilt, Kentucky.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
111.7
Efficiency
57.6
Usage
42.4
Consistency
57
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 69. Ball State: 122. Eastern Kentucky: 88. Akron: 169. Vanderbilt: 72. Florida: 289. Georgia: 95. Missouri: 139. Tennessee: 70. Mississippi State: 86. Alabama: 58. South Carolina: 68. Louisville: 127
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 17 by 47.2. Ball State: 17 by 79.9. Eastern Kentucky: 15 by 51.5. Akron: 10 by 100. Vanderbilt: 18 by 45.3. Florida: 27 by 94.6. Georgia: 17 by 47.9. Missouri: 22 by 66.3. Tennessee: 19 by 31.8. Mississippi State: 22 by 40.1. Alabama: 17 by 27.8. South Carolina: 13 by 53.6. Louisville: 18 by 63.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Clemson | L 35-38 | 13 | 63 | 4.80 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Louisville2+ TD | W 38-31 | 14 | 76 | 5.40 | 1 | 4 | 51 | 7.1 |
| Sun 11/19 | @ South Carolina | L 14-17 | 12 | 61 | 5.10 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5.2 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Alabama2+ TD | L 21-49 | 12 | 26 | 2.20 | 2 | 5 | 32 | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Mississippi State | W 24-3 | 21 | 80 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3.9 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Tennessee | L 27-33 | 16 | 42 | 2.60 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Missouri100 rush yards | L 21-38 | 20 | 128 | 6.40 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6.3 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Georgia | L 13-51 | 15 | 59 | 3.90 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 5.6 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Florida100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 33-14 | 26 | 280 | 10.80 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 10.7 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Vanderbilt2+ TD | W 45-28 | 17 | 78 | 4.60 | 2 | 1 | -6 | 4 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Akron150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 35-3 | 7 | 72 | 10.30 | 1 | 3 | 97 | 16.9 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 28-17 | 12 | 52 | 4.30 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Ball State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 44-14 | 14 | 112 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 7.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2019-2020
Opening stop
Vanderbilt
2021-2022
Peak year stop
Kentucky
2023
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Temple | 1,117 | 55.1 | 30 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Temple | 1,117 | 55.1 | 30 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Temple | 370 | 38.6 | 35.2 | -747 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 238 | 51.6 | 27.1 | -132 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1,057 | 46 | 39.8 | 819 |
| 2023 Postseason | Kentucky | 1,452 | 57.6 | 42.4 | 395 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Kentucky | 1,452 | 57.6 | 42.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
289
Primary metric
289 scrimmage yards and 60 usage.
#2
South Carolina
172
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
172 scrimmage yards and 35.6 usage.
#3
East Carolina
157
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
157 scrimmage yards and 31.2 usage.
#4
Bucknell
138
Primary metric
Win with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
138 scrimmage yards and 15.3 usage.
#5
Georgia Tech
147
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
147 scrimmage yards and 51.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Postseason · Kentucky
1,452 primary output · 57.6 efficiency · 42.4 usage
64.2
#2
2023 Regular Season · Kentucky
64.2
1,452 primary · 57.6 efficiency · 42.4 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
58.6
1,057 primary · 46 efficiency · 39.8 usage
11
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.827
Blair Academy · Blairstown, NJ
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,234
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.