Player Stats

Brandon Crossley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
136
TFL
10.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
23
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonColorado State79-0-4016.4
2020 Regular SeasonSMU92120-5256.2
2021 Regular SeasonSMU1125-012016.4
2022 Regular SeasonSMU114060-5059.8
2023 PostseasonSMU53-0--032.4
2023 Regular SeasonSMU5820-1032.4
2024 PostseasonSMU123-0--037.4
2024 Regular SeasonSMU12270.5016137.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

SMU paired 12 primary output with 26 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 17.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado State, SMU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · SMU

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

17.5

Usage

2.5

Consistency

40.2

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 1. Houston Christian: 2. BYU: 0. TCU: 0. Florida State: 1. Louisville: 0. Stanford: 1. Duke: 2.5. Pittsburgh: 1. Boston College: 0. Virginia: 0. California: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 3 by 22.5. Houston Christian: 1 by 24.2. BYU: 1 by 4.2. TCU: 3 by 12.5. Florida State: 2 by 18.3. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. Stanford: 1 by 14.2. Duke: 3 by 37.5. Pittsburgh: 4 by 26.7. Boston College: 3 by 12.5. Virginia: 3 by 12.5. California: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 10 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.3 vs Wins