Player Stats

Seth Coleman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
181
TFL
27.5
Sacks
15.5
QB hurries
18
Passes defended
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonIllinois00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonIllinois5133.50--033.7
2021 Regular SeasonIllinois7223212043
2022 Regular SeasonIllinois11435.55106063.3
2023 Regular SeasonIllinois12509623062
2024 Regular SeasonIllinois11536.52.553053.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Illinois paired 26.5 primary output with 34.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 35.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Illinois

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

35.5

Usage

9.9

Consistency

32

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Illinois: 1. Kansas: 1. Central Michigan: 4. Nebraska: 1. Penn State: 1. Purdue: 0.5. Michigan: 1. Oregon: 0. Minnesota: 2. Michigan State: 5. Rutgers: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Illinois: 3 by 22.5. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. Central Michigan: 5 by 60.8. Nebraska: 4 by 26.7. Penn State: 6 by 35. Purdue: 6 by 30. Michigan: 8 by 43.3. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Minnesota: 3 by 32.5. Michigan State: 5 by 70.8. Rutgers: 7 by 34.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 8 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · -0.8 vs Wins