Player Stats

Ajani Carter College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
123
TFL
5
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonUtah State81-0--038.3
2019 Regular SeasonUtah State811-0--038.3
2020 Regular SeasonUtah State57-0--037.8
2021 PostseasonUtah State117-0--053.2
2021 Regular SeasonUtah State11383221053.2
2022 Regular SeasonUtah State103710-5051
2024 Regular SeasonHouston102210.5-3022.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Utah State paired 11 primary output with 27.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 13.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Houston.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: TCU

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Houston

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

13.7

Usage

2.5

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

TCU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Rice: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Iowa State: 0. TCU: 2. Utah: 0.5. Kansas State: 0. Arizona: 0. Baylor: 1. BYU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 2 by 18.3. Cincinnati: 3 by 12.5. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. TCU: 5 by 40.8. Utah: 3 by 17.5. Kansas State: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 1 by 14.2. BYU: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 4 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Wins