Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2020-2024Toledo
Demeer Blankumsee
WR • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Demeer Blankumsee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
53.4
Season Value
57
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Memphis
202121222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Toledo • Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Demeer Blankumsee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Memphis. Demeer Blankumsee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Memphis paired 901 primary output with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Toledo, Memphis.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Memphis
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
52.1
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
15.4
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 120. Unknown: 46. Troy: 50. Florida State: 44. Navy: 20. Middle Tennessee: 18. South Florida: 40. North Texas: 96. Charlotte: 21. UTSA: 142. Rice: 25. UAB: 43. Tulane: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 4 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Troy: 4 by 83.3. Florida State: 4 by 73.3. Navy: 2 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 60. South Florida: 3 by 88.9. North Texas: 6 by 100. Charlotte: 4 by 35. UTSA: 6 by 100. Rice: 4 by 41.7. UAB: 2 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins46.9 · n=10 · -34.1 vs Losses
Losses81 · n=2 · +34.1 vs Wins
First Half48.3 · n=7 · -8.2 vs Second Half
Second Half56.5 · n=6 · +8.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/18 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards | W 42-37 | — | 4 | 120 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 89 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Tulane | W 34-24 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs UAB | W 53-18 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Rice | W 27-20 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 36-44 | — | 6 | 142 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 2 | 69 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Charlotte | W 33-28 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs North Texas | W 52-44 | — | 6 | 96 | 13 | 16 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ South Florida | W 21-3 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 24-7 | — | 2 | 18 | 6.3 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Navy | L 44-56 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Florida State | W 20-12 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Troy | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2020-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Memphis
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
202020212021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Toledo | 165 | 66.4 | 11.7 | 165 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 165 | 66.4 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Toledo | 512 | 76.6 | 27.6 | 347 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 512 | 76.6 | 27.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Memphis | 901 | 85.5 | 15.8 | 389 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Memphis | 901 | 85.5 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Memphis | 677 | 79.1 | 15.4 | -224 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Memphis | 677 | 79.1 | 15.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San Diego State
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
142
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Memphis
901 primary output · 85.5 efficiency · 15.8 usage
67.2
#2
2023 Regular Season · Memphis
67.2
901 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Memphis
57
677 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 15.4 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9575
Greene County · Leakesville, MS
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,255
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.