Usage Score
26.1
Player Dossier
2020-2023Florida State
RB • 6'1" • 223 lbs • Greenville, MS, USA
Trey Benson leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
26.1
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
68.5
Season Value
62.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Florida State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trey Benson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Florida State. Trey Benson leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.5 efficiency.
Trey Benson played RB for Oregon and Florida State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Trey Benson recorded 1,917 rushing yards, 371 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Florida State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Florida State paired 1,132 primary output with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oregon, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Win with 215 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
87.1
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
26.1
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 54. Southern Miss: 99. Boston College: 39. Clemson: 75. Virginia Tech: 215. Syracuse: 80. Duke: 24. Wake Forest: 155. Pittsburgh: 97. Miami: 97. Unknown: 22. Florida: 93. Louisville: 82
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 13 by 41.8. Southern Miss: 10 by 91.3. Boston College: 13 by 32.3. Clemson: 10 by 53.6. Virginia Tech: 14 by 100. Syracuse: 15 by 55.3. Duke: 12 by 24.6. Wake Forest: 14 by 80.5. Pittsburgh: 12 by 83.7. Miami: 17 by 55. Unknown: 6 by 38.2. Florida: 20 by 50.6. Louisville: 20 by 40.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/3 | vs Louisville | W 16-6 | 18 | 67 | 3.70 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4.1 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ Florida2+ TD | W 24-15 | 19 | 95 | 5 | 3 | 1 | -2 | 4.7 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 22 | 3.70 | 1 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Miami2+ TD | W 27-20 | 16 | 80 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Pittsburgh | W 24-7 | 12 | 97 | 8.10 | 1 | — | — | 8.1 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Wake Forest150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 41-16 | 10 | 55 | 5.50 | 1 | 4 | 100 | 11.1 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Duke | W 38-20 | 10 | 26 | 2.60 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Syracuse | W 41-3 | 14 | 74 | 5.30 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Virginia Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 39-17 | 11 | 200 | 18.20 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 15.4 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Clemson | W 31-24 | 7 | 25 | 3.60 | 0 | 3 | 50 | 7.5 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Boston College | W 31-29 | 12 | 38 | 3.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Southern Miss2+ TD | W 66-13 | 9 | 79 | 8.80 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 9.9 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs LSU | W 45-24 | 12 | 47 | 3.90 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oregon
2020-2021
Opening stop
Florida State
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oregon | 22 | 38.2 | 4.9 | 22 |
| 2022 Postseason | Florida State | 1,134 | 62.8 | 21.8 | 1,112 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Florida State | 1,134 | 62.8 | 21.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida State | 1,132 | 57.5 | 26.1 | -2 |
#1 Featured game
Virginia Tech
Win with 215 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
215
Primary metric
215 scrimmage yards and 25.9 usage.
#2
Syracuse
166
Primary metric
Win with 166 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
166 scrimmage yards and 30.8 usage.
#3
Miami
153
Primary metric
Win with 153 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
153 scrimmage yards and 25.8 usage.
#4
Florida
162
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
162 scrimmage yards and 38.6 usage.
#5
Wake Forest
155
Primary metric
Win with 155 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
155 scrimmage yards and 26.4 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Florida State
1,132 primary output · 57.5 efficiency · 26.1 usage
62.6
#2
2022 Postseason · Florida State
62.3
1,134 primary · 62.8 efficiency · 21.8 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Florida State
62.3
1,134 primary · 62.8 efficiency · 21.8 usage
7
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.82
Millikan · Long Beach, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,288
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.