Player Stats

Zae Baines College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
668
Receptions
55
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTemple1-00100
2021 Regular SeasonTemple0-00-
2022 Regular SeasonTemple819226251
2023 Regular SeasonTemple1136442168.1
2024 Regular SeasonTemple0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Temple paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 76.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Navy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Temple

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

40.2

Efficiency

76.5

Usage

14.4

Consistency

47.8

Best Game by takeover score

Navy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Akron: 48. Rutgers: 21. Norfolk State: 49. Miami: 34. Tulsa: 19. North Texas: 17. SMU: 27. Navy: 132. South Florida: 38. UAB: 30. Memphis: 27

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 4 by 80. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Norfolk State: 2 by 100. Miami: 5 by 45.3. Tulsa: 4 by 31.7. North Texas: 1 by 100. SMU: 2 by 90. Navy: 7 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 84.4. UAB: 4 by 50. Memphis: 3 by 60

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins76.3 · Games = 3 · +49.7 vs Losses
Losses26.6 · Games = 8 · -49.7 vs Wins