Player Stats

Kam Arnold College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
257
TFL
11
Sacks
4
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonBoston College61510--010.9
2021 Regular SeasonBoston College12613.5112047.5
2022 Regular SeasonBoston College12764232061.9
2023 PostseasonBoston College136212-047.8
2023 Regular SeasonBoston College13590.5033047.8
2024 Regular SeasonBoston College640-0-1024.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Boston College paired 13 primary output with 37.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 31.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

31.1

Usage

5.3

Consistency

5.6

Best Game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duquesne: 0. Missouri: 0. Michigan State: 0. Western Kentucky: 2. Virginia: 0. Virginia Tech: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duquesne: 3 by 12.5. Missouri: 8 by 33.3. Michigan State: 9 by 37.5. Western Kentucky: 11 by 65.8. Virginia: 4 by 16.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.7 vs Wins