Usage Score
22.7
Player Dossier
2020-2022Pittsburgh
Jordan Addison
WR • 6'0" • 175 lbs • Frederick, MD, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan Addison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.9
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Pittsburgh
20212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh • USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Addison, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Jordan Addison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 1,593 primary output with 89 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · USC
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
79.5
Efficiency
82.9
Usage
22.7
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 54. Stanford: 172. Fresno State: 69. Oregon State: 42. Arizona State: 105. Washington State: 37. Utah: 106. Colorado: 2. UCLA: 178. Notre Dame: 45. Utah: 65
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 5 by 72. Stanford: 7 by 100. Fresno State: 6 by 76.7. Oregon State: 3 by 93.3. Arizona State: 8 by 87.5. Washington State: 3 by 82.2. Utah: 7 by 100. Colorado: 1 by 13.3. UCLA: 11 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. Utah: 5 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins78.2 · n=9 · -7.3 vs Losses
Losses85.5 · n=2 · +7.3 vs Wins
First Half79.8 · n=6 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half79.2 · n=5 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs Utah | L 24-47 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 48 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Notre Dame | W 38-27 | — | 3 | 45 | 14.5 | 15 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-45 | — | 11 | 178 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Colorado | W 55-17 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Utah100 receiving yards | L 42-43 | — | 7 | 106 | 14.8 | 15.10 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Washington State | W 30-14 | — | 3 | 37 | 7.5 | 12.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-25 | — | 8 | 105 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Oregon State | W 17-14 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Fresno State | W 45-17 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-28 | — | 7 | 172 | 24.6 | 24.60 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Rice2+ TD | W 66-14 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 2 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
USC
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 666 | 66.1 | 28.3 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,593 | 89 | 28.3 | 927 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,593 | 89 | 28.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 875 | 82.9 | 22.7 | -718 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
202
Primary metric
202 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
147
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCLA
178
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
172
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida State
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 77 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Pittsburgh
1,593 primary output · 89 efficiency · 28.3 usage
72.4
#2
2021 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
72.4
1,593 primary · 89 efficiency · 28.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · USC
54.8
875 primary · 82.9 efficiency · 22.7 usage
Milestones
14
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9085
Tuscarora · Frederick, MD
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,134
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.