Player Stats

Nazir Stackhouse College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
90
TFL
8.5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia33-0--037.2
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia6921--024.8
2022 Regular SeasonGeorgia11272.501-026.9
2023 PostseasonGeorgia133-0--041
2023 Regular SeasonGeorgia132132-1041
2024 PostseasonGeorgia122-0-1016.2
2024 Regular SeasonGeorgia122510--016.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Georgia paired 7 primary output with 13.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 11 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Georgia

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

11

Usage

2

Consistency

8.3

Best Game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. Clemson: 0. Tennessee Tech: 0. Kentucky: 0. Alabama: 0. Auburn: 0. Texas: 0.5. Florida: 0.5. Ole Miss: 0. Tennessee: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Texas: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 2 by 18.3. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Tennessee Tech: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 4 by 16.7. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 3 by 17.5. Florida: 3 by 17.5. Ole Miss: 5 by 20.8. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Texas: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.1 · Games = 9 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Wins