Player Stats

Kalel Mullings College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,267
Rushing yards
1,200
Receiving yards
67
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonMichigan1000050
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan6000050
2022 PostseasonMichigan944018.2
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan92626028.2
2023 PostseasonMichigan11462719040.7
2023 Regular SeasonMichigan1120819513140.7
2024 Regular SeasonMichigan12983948351276.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Michigan paired 983 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 50.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Win with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Michigan

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

81.9

Efficiency

50.5

Usage

30.9

Consistency

66.1

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 92. Texas: 25. Arkansas State: 153. USC: 161. Minnesota: 111. Washington: 49. Illinois: 95. Michigan State: 18. Oregon: 16. Indiana: 38. Northwestern: 109. Ohio State: 116

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 15 by 63.9. Texas: 6 by 43.4. Arkansas State: 15 by 92.5. USC: 18 by 87.3. Minnesota: 24 by 48.2. Washington: 14 by 36.5. Illinois: 20 by 48.4. Michigan State: 13 by 14.4. Oregon: 8 by 20.8. Indiana: 12 by 31.9. Northwestern: 14 by 80.4. Ohio State: 32 by 37.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins108.6 · Games = 7 · +64.0 vs Losses
Losses44.6 · Games = 5 · -64.0 vs Wins