Usage Score
14.3
Player Dossier
2020-2024Georgia
WR • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Bradley, FL, USA
Arian Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.3
Efficiency
75.2
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Georgia
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Arian Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Georgia. Arian Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Arian Smith played WR for Georgia. Across 5 tracked seasons, Arian Smith recorded 93 rushing yards, 1,356 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Georgia.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Georgia paired 817 primary output with 75.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
58.4
Efficiency
75.2
Usage
14.3
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 67. Clemson: 56. Unknown: 73. Kentucky: 13. Alabama: 132. Auburn: 4. Mississippi State: 134. Texas: 32. Florida: 59. Ole Miss: 32. Tennessee: 50. Massachusetts: 110. Georgia Tech: 14. Texas: 41
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Clemson: 5 by 74.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Kentucky: 2 by 43.3. Alabama: 6 by 100. Auburn: 1 by 26.7. Mississippi State: 5 by 100. Texas: 6 by 35.6. Florida: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 71.1. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 2 by 46.7. Texas: 5 by 54.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | vs Notre Dame | L 10-23 | — | 1 | 67 | 40 | 67 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Texas | W 22-19 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Georgia Tech | W 44-42 | — | 2 | 14 | 14.7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Massachusetts100 receiving yards | W 59-21 | — | 3 | 110 | 36.7 | 36.70 | 1 | 49 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Tennessee | W 31-17 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-28 | — | 3 | 32 | 8 | 10.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Florida | W 34-20 | — | 2 | 59 | 21 | 29.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Texas | W 30-15 | — | 6 | 32 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards | W 41-31 | — | 5 | 134 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Auburn | W 31-13 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Alabama100 receiving yards | L 34-41 | — | 6 | 132 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Kentucky | W 13-12 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Clemson | W 34-3 | — | 5 | 56 | 10.5 | 11.20 | 0 | 32 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Georgia
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia | 86 | 100 | 6.9 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia | 86 | 100 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia | 102 | 80 | 5.5 | 16 |
| 2022 Postseason | Georgia | 198 | 62.7 | 6.5 | 96 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia | 198 | 62.7 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia | 153 | 78.3 | 6.8 | -45 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia | 153 | 78.3 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia | 817 | 75.2 | 14.3 | 664 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia | 817 | 75.2 | 14.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio State
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Georgia
817 primary output · 75.2 efficiency · 14.3 usage
62.3
#2
2024 Regular Season · Georgia
62.3
817 primary · 75.2 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Georgia
45.1
86 primary · 100 efficiency · 6.9 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9994
IMG Academy · Bradenton, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,356
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.