Player Stats

Arian Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,356
Receptions
68
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 PostseasonGeorgia3155049
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia3131149
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia33102244.4
2022 PostseasonGeorgia54132131.9
2022 Regular SeasonGeorgia5366031.9
2023 PostseasonGeorgia7112139.1
2023 Regular SeasonGeorgia77141139.1
2024 PostseasonGeorgia14167070.6
2024 Regular SeasonGeorgia1447750470.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Georgia paired 817 primary output with 75.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 75.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Georgia

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

58.4

Efficiency

75.2

Usage

14.3

Consistency

59.6

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 67. Clemson: 56. Tennessee Tech: 73. Kentucky: 13. Alabama: 132. Auburn: 4. Mississippi State: 134. Texas: 32. Florida: 59. Ole Miss: 32. Tennessee: 50. Massachusetts: 110. Georgia Tech: 14. Texas: 41

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Clemson: 5 by 74.7. Tennessee Tech: 4 by 100. Kentucky: 2 by 43.3. Alabama: 6 by 100. Auburn: 1 by 26.7. Mississippi State: 5 by 100. Texas: 6 by 35.6. Florida: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 71.1. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 2 by 46.7. Texas: 5 by 54.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.3 · Games = 11 · -23.7 vs Losses
Losses77 · Games = 3 · +23.7 vs Wins