Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2020-2025Missouri
WR • 6'5" • 203 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
J.J. Hester reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.9
Efficiency
69.6
Consistency
57.8
Season Value
43.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
J.J. Hester, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma. J.J. Hester reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Oklahoma paired 315 primary output with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Missouri, Oklahoma, Kentucky.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
29.3
Efficiency
69.6
Usage
8.9
Consistency
57.8
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 23. Florida: 29. Vanderbilt: 59. Louisville: 6
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 4 by 38.3. Florida: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 2 by 100. Louisville: 1 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Missouri
2020-2021
Opening stop
Oklahoma
2022-2024
Peak year stop
Kentucky
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Missouri | 225 | 85.7 | 6.4 | 225 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Missouri | 225 | 85.7 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 13 | 86.7 | 4.8 | -212 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | -13 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 315 | 83.3 | 14.6 | 315 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kentucky | 117 | 69.6 | 8.9 | -198 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
79
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma
315 primary output · 83.3 efficiency · 14.6 usage
63.2
#2
2021 Postseason · Missouri
55
225 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Missouri
55
225 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 6.4 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8974
Booker T. Washington · Tulsa, OK
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
670
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 19 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
J.J. Hester quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit