Player Stats

Curtis Jacobs College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
169
TFL
24
Sacks
9.5
QB hurries
8
Passes defended
3
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonPenn State590.50-1010.3
2021 PostseasonPenn State121011--051.7
2021 Regular SeasonPenn State1251621-051.7
2022 PostseasonPenn State11222--065
2022 Regular SeasonPenn State11475.5222265
2023 PostseasonPenn State13310--061
2023 Regular SeasonPenn State134782.55-061

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Penn State paired 16.5 primary output with 32.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Penn State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

28.7

Usage

8

Consistency

48.2

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 1. West Virginia: 3. Delaware: 1. Illinois: 1. Iowa: 1. Northwestern: 0. Massachusetts: 1. Ohio State: 0.5. Indiana: 1. Maryland: 1.5. Michigan: 1.5. Rutgers: 1. Michigan State: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 3 by 22.5. West Virginia: 10 by 71.7. Delaware: 0 by 10. Illinois: 2 by 18.3. Iowa: 3 by 22.5. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Massachusetts: 5 by 30.8. Ohio State: 9 by 42.5. Indiana: 1 by 14.2. Maryland: 3 by 27.5. Michigan: 7 by 44.2. Rutgers: 1 by 14.2. Michigan State: 3 by 42.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 10 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · -0.4 vs Wins