Player Stats

Fadil Diggs College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
117
TFL
31.5
Sacks
15
QB hurries
11
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTexas A&M12-0--042.2
2021 Regular SeasonTexas A&M492.511-038.9
2022 Regular SeasonTexas A&M828531-033.2
2023 Regular SeasonTexas A&M123611462057
2024 Regular SeasonSyracuse104213731073.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Syracuse paired 24 primary output with 40.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 40.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Syracuse.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Syracuse

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

2.4

Efficiency

40.5

Usage

18

Consistency

54.6

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 6. Georgia Tech: 2. Stanford: 1. UNLV: 4. NC State: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Boston College: 1. California: 4. UConn: 2. Miami: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 8 by 83.3. Georgia Tech: 7 by 49.2. Stanford: 6 by 35. UNLV: 6 by 65. NC State: 1 by 4.2. Virginia Tech: 4 by 16.7. Boston College: 2 by 18.3. California: 2 by 48.3. UConn: 2 by 28.3. Miami: 4 by 56.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.8 · Games = 8 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · -1.8 vs Wins