Player Stats

Cody Simon College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
259
TFL
22.5
Sacks
10
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 PostseasonOhio State31-0--037.8
2020 Regular SeasonOhio State33-0--037.8
2021 Regular SeasonOhio State12542.5131037
2022 Regular SeasonOhio State10325.5211030.1
2023 PostseasonOhio State1312-0--021.2
2023 Regular SeasonOhio State134520-2021.2
2024 PostseasonOhio State153842-2069.9
2024 Regular SeasonOhio State15748.55-5069.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Ohio State paired 26.5 primary output with 48.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 48.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

15

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

48.1

Usage

11.8

Consistency

33.1

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. Texas: 0. Oregon: 6. Tennessee: 1. Western Michigan: 3. Marshall: 0. Michigan State: 1. Iowa: 1. Oregon: 1. Nebraska: 3. Penn State: 2. Purdue: 1. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 5. Michigan: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 8 by 43.3. Texas: 7 by 29.2. Oregon: 11 by 95.8. Tennessee: 12 by 60. Western Michigan: 3 by 42.5. Marshall: 4 by 16.7. Michigan State: 2 by 18.3. Iowa: 6 by 35. Oregon: 10 by 51.7. Nebraska: 8 by 63.3. Penn State: 10 by 61.7. Purdue: 6 by 35. Northwestern: 6 by 25. Indiana: 10 by 91.7. Michigan: 9 by 52.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 13 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 2 · -0.6 vs Wins